Archive for the ‘Evasive Treatment’ Category

Have you ever asked yourself…. Why isn’t there a Diabetes Act or an Alzheimer Act but there seems to be a CANCER ACT?

Yes you heard right.

(more…)

Everybody talks about the immune system, but few can tell you what it is. Your immune system is a complicated system of cells and biological reactions which the body employs to ward off imagesCAVR5QNNinvaders and to prevent its own cells from deteriorating and mutating. The immune system is responsible for recognizing foreign proteins and cells and for triggering an attack against them.

(more…)

Cancer- You have read about it – You hear about it -You see it on TV – But there is one thing you are never told – the TRUTH.

You are never told the truth about the incidence of cancer. It is growing by leaps and bounds. In 1960 1 out of 4 people had cancer. Today it is 1 out of 3. Soon it will be 1 out of 2. In just the last 30 years the incidence of cancer has gone up a shocking 40%.

(more…)

Chemotherapy is an invasive and toxic treatment able supposedly to eliminate cancer cells. Unfortunately though, its ferocious chemistry is not able to differentiate between the cancerous cell or the healthy cell and surrounding healthy tissue. Put simply, chemotherapy is an intravenously administered poison that kills all living matter. Repeated chemotherapy and repeated radiation treatments kill the whole body by degrees. The immune system is hit particularly hard by chemotherapy and often does not recuperate enough to adequately protect from common illnesses, which can then lead to death. Some 67% of people who die during cancer treatment do so through opportunistic infections arising as a direct result of the immune system failing because of the aggressive and toxic nature of the drugs.

(more…)

The Failure of Chemo has been the story from the beginning……

“MD and Professor Dr. Guy B. Faguet points out, With the traditional use of chemotherapy, “though most patients achieve some degree of tumor response, few survive longer as a result.”

I wouldn’t have chemotherapy and radiation because I’m not interested in therapies that cripple the immune system, and, in my opinion, virtually ensure failure for the majority of cancer patients.”—Dr Julian Whitaker, M.D.

Children who are successfully treated for Hodgkin’s disease are 18 times more likely later to develop secondary malignant tumours. Girls face a 35 per cent chance of developing breast cancer by the time they are 40—-which is 75 times greater than the average. The risk of leukemia increased markedly four years after the ending of successful treatment, and reached a plateau after 14 years, but the risk of developing solid tumours remained high and approached 30 per cent at 30 years (New Eng J Med, March 21, 1996)

(more…)

Every year in the UK, 200,000 people are diagnosed with cancer and 152,500 people die. In the US, the annual death rate for this disease is approximately 547,000. These deaths are recorded as cancer deaths, but how many of these deaths are really attributable to the disease itself? How many deaths should in fact be recorded as ‘death by doctoring’? When we consider that conventional treatment consists almost entirely of radiation, chemotherapy and the long-term application of toxic pharmaceuticals, treatments which are all well known for their life-threatening side-effects, then the question becomes all the more legitimate. On chemotherapy for instance, note the following:

“Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon, or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for over a decade, yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors”

Allen Levin, MD UCSF The Healing of Cancer, Marcus Books, 1990

(more…)

The documentary discusses the enormous amounts of money made by politicians and pharmaceutical companies in the cancer industry.

If money raised is going to pharmaceutical drug research, it’s more than likely wasted.
Why do I say that?
Because the cancer death rate has only improved about 5% since 1950.
That’s a whopping 0.083% improvement per year on average.

But what about 5-year survival? Aren’t cancer patients are living longer than ever before?
Not really, 5-year survival has only improved about 5% since 1970.
That’s a 0.166% improvement per year on average. Hey it’s twice as good as the improvement in the death rate, but still embarrassingly pathetic considering the fact that hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent since Nixon declared “War on Cancer”.

If you want to help cancer patients, put some money directly in their hands that they can use to pay for treatments, or to put food on the table, or gas in the car. I guarantee it will not be wasted

Here is a great video from Chris Wark on why he doesnt support CANCER RESEARCH

Cancer drugs, pushed by many drug companies as the only ‘scientific’ method of combating cancer alongside chemotherapy, have been found to actually make cancer worse and kill patients more quickly. The findings come after research was conducted on the cancer drugs at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. Sold at a premium price to cancer sufferers, it turns out these drugs are not only ineffective but highly dangerous.

Something known as anti-antiogenesis is the primary function behind many such widely-used cancer drugs that were analyzed in the study. Researchers examined drugs such as imatanib (a leukemia drug that goes by the brand name Gleevec) and sunitinib (a drug for gastrointestinal tumors — brand name Sutent), finding that these drugs may initially reduce tumor size but afterwards cause tumors to ‘metasize’ aggressively. This means that the tumors come back much stronger and grow much larger than their original size.

Cancer Drugs Lead to ‘Metasized’ Tumors. As a result, patients develop life-threatening tumors that oftentimes kill patients more quickly as a result of taking the drug.


(more…)

Doctors have been urged to be more cautious in offering cancer treatment to terminally-ill patients as chemotherapy can often do more harm than good, a study suggests.

The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) found that more than four in ten patients who received chemotherapy towards the end of life suffered potentially fatal effects from the drugs, and treatment was “inappropriate” in nearly a fifth of cases.

In a study of more than 600 cancer patients who died within 30 days of receiving treatment, chemotherapy probably caused or hastened death in 27 percent of cases, the inquiry found.

In only 35 percent of these cases was care judged to have been good by the inquiry’s advisors, with 49 percent having room for improvement and 8 per cent receiving less than satisfactory care.

(more…)